GeForce GTX 760A vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 349% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 54 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK106
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
17 March 2014
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
628 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
42.05
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,009 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4008 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.13 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
