GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 960A
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960A.
GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
190−200
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM107
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
13 March 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
640
448
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
180 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
