GeForce MX130 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce MX130 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX130 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX130
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5, DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 723% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
GeForce MX130 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX130.
GeForce MX130 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce MX130 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 548 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce MX130 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
55−60
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
160−170
210−220
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 67% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 82% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
60−65
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
80−85
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 28% more, than GeForce MX130.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce MX130.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce MX130.
Full Specs
GeForce MX130
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N16S-GTR
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 January 2018
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
1122 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1242 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
29.81
32.14
Floating-point performance
953.9 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
