GRID K280Q vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K280Q and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K280Q and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K280Q
Main Specs
GRID K280Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
190−200
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 47% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K280Q.
Full Specs
GRID K280Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK104
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1536
448
Core clock speed
745 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price