Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla C2075
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 1546% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 26 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
48
448
Core clock speed
300 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
