Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 1546% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 215% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
48
448
Core clock speed
300 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
32.14
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price