NVS 510 vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

NVS 510 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 605% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 223 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 88 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1350 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	192	448
Core clock speed	797 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	32.14
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares