Quadro 2000M vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2075.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 349% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 24 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2232 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Fermi	GF110
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 February 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	192	448
Core clock speed	550 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	32.14
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Tesla C2075

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares