Quadro CX vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
Main Specs
Quadro CX
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 64% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro CX has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 28 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Quadro CX is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1532 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
10−11
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−11
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 412% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
3−4
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
3−4
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
8−9
60−65
medium / 768p
7−8
35−40
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro CX.
Full Specs
Quadro CX
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GT200B
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
11 November 2008
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
602 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
38.53
32.14
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
267 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
1.3
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
