Quadro FX 3800 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
108 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 128% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 50 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1532 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
9−10
55−60
medium / 1080p
2−3
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
100−110
210−220
medium / 768p
75−80
190−200
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
9−10
30−35
high / 768p
50−55
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
40−45
100−110
ultra / 1080p
14−16
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
1−2
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
7−8
45−50
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
110−120
medium / 1080p
4−5
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
1−2
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 583% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
35−40
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
1−2
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
0−1
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
1−2
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
4−5
60−65
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
35−40
high / 768p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GT200B
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
30 March 2009
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
600 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
38.40
32.14
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
198 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
1.3
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
