Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K1200 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K1200 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K1200 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 448% more power consumption, than Quadro K1200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1200 is 484 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K1200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 88 mm longer, than Quadro K1200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1200 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	200−210	210−220
medium / 768p	170−180	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	130−140	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	75−80	80−85
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K1200.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 January 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	512	448
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	35.97	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	132 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares