Quadro K2000D vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2000D and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2000D stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
Main Specs
Quadro K2000D
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 384% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 380 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K2000D is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 46 mm longer, than Quadro K2000D.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
140−150
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
85−90
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 121% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
35−40
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000D
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK107
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 March 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
954 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
32.14
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
202 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
