Quadro K2000M vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2000M and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2000M and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 349% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1332 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N14P-Q3
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
745 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
32.14
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
