Quadro K2200 vs Tesla C2075

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 263% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 472 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 46 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−11
QHD / 1440p	5−6	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	60−65	55−60
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	210−220
medium / 768p	190−200	190−200
ultra / 1080p	110−120	100−110
QHD / 1440p	75−80	65−70
4K / 2160p	40−45	30−35
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	20−22	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 2% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−12	10−11
low / 720p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	85−90	80−85
high / 1080p	35−40	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
QHD / 1440p	5−6	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	10−12	10−12
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
medium / 768p	40−45	35−40
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
Quadro K2200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	44.96	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	202 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	162 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	1.6 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2200 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares