Quadro K4000 vs Tesla C2075
When comparing Quadro K4000 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K4000 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Main Specs
Quadro K4000
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 208% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K4000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 236 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 7 mm longer, than Quadro K4000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 2484 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
Quadro K4000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Quadro K4000
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK106
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 March 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
810 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
51.84
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,244 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
241 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5616 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
134.8 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
61 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price