Quadro K420 vs Tesla C2075

When comparing Quadro K420 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K420 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K420 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K420	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB/2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 502% more power consumption, than Quadro K420.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro K420.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K420 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K420 is 302 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K420 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 88 mm longer, than Quadro K420.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1350 MHz higher, than Quadro K420.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	9−10	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	9−10	55−60
medium / 1080p	2−3	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	100−110	210−220
medium / 768p	75−80	190−200
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 142% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	7−8	45−50
medium / 1080p	2−3	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	110−120
medium / 1080p	4−5	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	1−2	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	10−12	60−65
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 720% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	35−40	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	1−2	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	4−5	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro K420.

Full Specs

	Quadro K420	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	192	448
Core clock speed	876 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	14.02	32.14
Floating-point performance	336.4 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	11 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K420 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares