Quadro K4200 vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K4200 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K4200 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K4200	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 128% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K4200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 197 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K4200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 7 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 2268 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	30−33	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	6−7
4K / 2160p	9−10	6−7
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 32% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K4200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	120−130	100−110
QHD / 1440p	100−105	65−70
4K / 2160p	55−60	30−35
high / 768p	170−180	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	20−22	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	55−60	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	75−80	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	95−100	80−85
high / 1080p	40−45	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
QHD / 1440p	8−9	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−12	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	9−10	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 32% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro K4200	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK104	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1344	448
Core clock speed	771 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	784 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	87.81	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	241 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	119 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares