Quadro K620 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between Quadro K620 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K620 and Tesla C2075.

Quadro K620 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K620	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 502% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 484 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 88 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1332 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	190−200
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	110−120	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−33	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	110−120
medium / 1080p	40−45	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 47% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	80−85
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	7−8	10−12
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	40−45	60−65
medium / 768p	24−27	35−40
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K620.

Full Specs

	Quadro K620	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	384	448
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.98	32.14
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	104 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K620 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares