Quadro M2000 vs Tesla C2075

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro M2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 222 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro M2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 47 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 3480 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	6−7
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 24% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	120−130	100−110
QHD / 1440p	90−95	65−70
4K / 2160p	50−55	30−35
high / 768p	170−180	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	10−11
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	95−100	80−85
high / 1080p	40−45	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	7−8	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM206	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	8 April 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed	796 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	201 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.2	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares