Quadro M3000M vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro M3000M Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 247 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI
  Check Price Check Price
  • Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
  • Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
  • Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
  • Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 476 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
  • Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 35−40 16−18
ultra / 1080p 21−24 10−11
QHD / 1440p 16−18 4−5
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 60−65 35−40
medium / 1080p 40−45 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

  Quadro M3000M Tesla C2075
Architecture Maxwell Fermi 2.0
Code name GM204 GF110
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Release date 2 October 2015 25 July 2011
Pipelines 1,024 448
Core clock speed 1050 MHz 574 MHz
Transistor count 5,200 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 67.20 32.14
Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Length 248 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.0 5.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
CUDA 5.2 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s 94 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price