Quadro M3000M vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 476 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M3000M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro M3000M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM204
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1,024
448
Core clock speed
1050 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
67.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.2
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price