Quadro M620 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between Quadro M620 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M620 and Tesla C2075.
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M620
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 723% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
Quadro M620 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro M620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 444 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro M620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Quadro M620
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
13 January 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
1018 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
