Quadro P2000 vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro P2000 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro P2000	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Quadro P2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P2000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 502 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P2000 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 47 mm longer, than Quadro P2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 3876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−11
QHD / 1440p	18−20	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 124% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	65−70
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	30−33	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−33	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	110−120	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	130−140	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	24−27	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 82% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	21−24	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	9−10	1−2
low / 720p	70−75	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	70−75	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	50−55	21−24
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	55−60	35−40
high / 768p	−	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro P2000	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GP106	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	6 February 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1024	448
Core clock speed	1076 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1480 MHz
Transistor count	4,400 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	94.72	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	201 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	160 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.19 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P2000 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares