Quadro P3200 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6084 MB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P3200 has 6078 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 134 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
QHD / 1440p
20−22
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−12
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
QHD / 1440p
40−45
6−7
4K / 2160p
21−24
6−7
low / 720p
110−120
55−60
medium / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 148% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
190−200
100−110
QHD / 1440p
120−130
65−70
4K / 2160p
80−85
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
50−55
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
low / 720p
85−90
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
65−70
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
190−200
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
65−70
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
10−11
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
130−140
80−85
high / 1080p
75−80
30−35
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
QHD / 1440p
27−30
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
10−11
1−2
low / 720p
75−80
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 169% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
9−10
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
75−80
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 115% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
35−40
high / 1080p
50−55
21−24
ultra / 1080p
30−33
12−14
4K / 2160p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 146% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
high / 768p
−
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Quadro P3200
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N18E-Q1
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
27 February 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1792
448
Core clock speed
708 - 1202 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1228 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
