Quadro P400 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between Quadro P400 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P400 and Tesla C2075.

Quadro P400 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro P400	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	3x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 723% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
Quadro P400 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P400.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P400 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 654 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P400 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 103 mm longer, than Quadro P400.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P400 is 876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	140−150	210−220
medium / 768p	110−120	190−200
ultra / 1080p	55−60	100−110
QHD / 1440p	30−35	65−70
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	85−90	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	60−65	100−110
ultra / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	9−10	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	16−18	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	110−120
medium / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 121% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	55−60	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	80−85
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−12
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	27−30	60−65
medium / 768p	18−20	35−40
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro P400.

Full Specs

	Quadro P400	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GP107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	256	448
Core clock speed	1228 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1252 MHz
Transistor count	3,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	20.03	32.14
Floating-point performance	679.9 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	145 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.06 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P400 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares