Radeon 630 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Radeon 630 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon 630 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:
Main Specs
Radeon 630
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
Radeon 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 630.
Radeon 630 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Radeon 630 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Radeon 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 227% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon 630.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon 630.
Full Specs
Radeon 630
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Lexa
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
12 August 2019
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
+
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
