Radeon Pro Duo vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro Duo and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro Duo stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

Radeon Pro Duo Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Radeon Pro Duo	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	3x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro Duo has 41% more power consumption, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon Pro Duo is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Duo has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon Pro Duo is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Radeon Pro Duo is 29 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2632 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Duo.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	50−55	16−18
ultra / 1080p	30−35	10−11
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	75−80	35−40
medium / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	75−80	27−30
ultra / 1080p	70−75	21−24
QHD / 1440p	50−55	6−7
4K / 2160p	27−30	6−7
low / 720p	130−140	55−60
medium / 1080p	85−90	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro Duo.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	230−240	190−200
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
QHD / 1440p	150−160	65−70
4K / 2160p	100−110	30−35
high / 768p	220−230	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	21−24
ultra / 1080p	60−65	18−20
QHD / 1440p	40−45	18−20
4K / 2160p	21−24	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	45−50
medium / 1080p	65−70	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	90−95	27−30
ultra / 1080p	70−75	21−24
QHD / 1440p	45−50	14−16
4K / 2160p	21−24	−
low / 720p	220−230	110−120
medium / 1080p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Fortnite is 141% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	85−90	27−30
ultra / 1080p	65−70	21−24
QHD / 1440p	45−50	10−11
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
low / 720p	130−140	60−65
medium / 1080p	90−95	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	160−170	90−95
medium / 768p	150−160	80−85
high / 1080p	95−100	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	14−16
QHD / 1440p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	10−12
ultra / 1080p	30−35	8−9
QHD / 1440p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	30−35
medium / 1080p	50−55	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Metro Exodus is 261% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	75−80	−
ultra / 1080p	55−60	14−16
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	120−130	60−65
medium / 1080p	85−90	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 181% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	35−40	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−12	−
low / 720p	90−95	30−35
medium / 1080p	55−60	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 178% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	180−190	60−65
medium / 768p	120−130	35−40
high / 1080p	70−75	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
4K / 2160p	24−27	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 221% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	90−95
medium / 768p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	65−70	35−40
high / 768p	−	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Radeon Pro Duo	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Capsaicin	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	4096	448
Core clock speed		574 MHz
Boost Clock	1000 MHz
Transistor count	8,900 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	256.0	32.14
Floating-point performance	2x 8,192 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	277 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX		12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA		2.0
FreeSync	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
HDMI	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	809 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Eyefinity	+
HD3D	+
PowerTune	+
TrueAudio	+
ZeroCore	+
Mantle	+
Design	reference
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
DisplayPort support	+
CrossFire	+
VCE	+
Compute units	128
AppAcceleration	+
LiquidVR	+
TressFX	+
UVD	+
Enduro	+
FRTC	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro Duo vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares