Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2075

When comparing Radeon R7 360 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 360 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Radeon R7 360 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 147% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 360.
Radeon R7 360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 360.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 360 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 83 mm longer, than Radeon R7 360.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 360 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	210−220	210−220
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
QHD / 1440p	55−60	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−35	30−35
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	110−120
medium / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−11
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−33	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	75−80	80−85
high / 1080p	30−35	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
Radeon R7 360 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R7 360.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon R7 360.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 360	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tobago	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 June 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed		574 MHz
Boost Clock	1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	50.40	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	165 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX		12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.2 kh/s
FreeSync	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
HDMI	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	225 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Eyefinity	+
PowerTune	+
TrueAudio	+
Mantle	+
Design	reference
Bridgeless CrossFire	+
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
DisplayPort support	+
CrossFire	+
VCE	+
DDMA audio	+
Decred / DCR (Decred)	0.29 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	10 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	102 Sol/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 360 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares