Radeon R7 M350 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 M350 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 M350 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M350
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 605% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M350.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 M350 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2132 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
85−90
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 310% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
9−10
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M350
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Opal
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
5 May 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
725 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.80
32.14
Floating-point performance
779.5 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
Not Listed
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Compute units
6
Check Price
