FirePro M4150 vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Tesla M10
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 318 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 1200 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Opal | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |