GeForce 845M vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between GeForce 845M and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 845M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
GeForce 845M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 845M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 845M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 845M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 845M.
- GeForce 845M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 845M.
- GeForce 845M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 845M and Tesla M10 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 845M is 38 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- GeForce 845M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 208% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 151% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 845M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM108 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.63 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |