GeForce GT 650M vs Tesla M10
When comparing GeForce GT 650M and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 650M and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M10
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- GeForce GT 650M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 166% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 220% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |