GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Tesla M10
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M10 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 497 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M10 is 38 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 95% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla M10. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | TU117 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | no data | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |