GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 2 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 4800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla M10. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Tesla M10 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro 7000
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960M
- Tesla M10 vs Quadro 7000
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 960M