GeForce GTX 760M vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 376 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14E-GL | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |