Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than Tesla M10.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Tesla M10 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro 7000
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 960M
- Tesla M10 vs Quadro 7000
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 960M