Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Tesla M10
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M10. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M10. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M10
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 185% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 281% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 July 2019 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |