Quadro FX 3800 vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M10.
Quadro FX 3800
Tesla M10
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M10 has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 433 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M10 is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3600 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |