Quadro K1100M vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Quadro K1100M and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1100M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 328 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |