Quadro K4100M vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Quadro K4100M and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4100M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 327 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |