Quadro M600M vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Quadro M600M and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M600M and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M600M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M600M and Tesla M10 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M600M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |