Radeon 520 vs Tesla M10
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon 520 and Tesla M10. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon 520 and Tesla M10. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M10
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 520 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon 520 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 2950 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon 520 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 520 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Oland | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Check Price |