Radeon HD 4810 vs Tesla M10
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M10. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M10. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
Tesla M10
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Tesla M10 has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 504 GB more memory, than Tesla M10.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M10 is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |