Radeon HD 7750M vs Tesla M10
When comparing Radeon HD 7750M and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 7750M and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M10
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 7750M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 703% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Radeon HD 7750M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Radeon HD 7750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7750M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 458 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Radeon HD 7750M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 7750M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Lombok XL | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 April 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |