Radeon HD 8870M vs Tesla M10
When comparing Radeon HD 8870M and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 8870M and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M10
Radeon HD 8870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8870M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- Radeon HD 8870M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8870M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 308 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- Radeon HD 8870M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Venus | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 December 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 107 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |