Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon PRO WX 2100 stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2018 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |