Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Tesla M10
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Tesla M10. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Tesla M10. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M10
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |