Radeon R9 M365X vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M365X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M365X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 4075 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tropo | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |