Radeon R9 M485X vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 11% more power consumption, than Tesla M10.
- Radeon R9 M485X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- Radeon R9 M485X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M485X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 310 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 35% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Amethyst | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |