Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon RX Vega M GH stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is connected by IGP, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 30 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla M10. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Vega | Maxwell |
Code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2018 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |