Tesla M10 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Tesla M10 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Tesla M10 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Tesla M10 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Tesla M10 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Tesla M10 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Tesla M10 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla M10 vs Quadro 7000
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 960M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro 7000
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 960M
- Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tesla M10 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100